https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/ Thu, 17 Sep 2026 21:10:33 +0000 MyBB https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1605.html Tue, 24 Jul 2012 23:29:03 +0000 OmarFW]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1605.html
]]>
]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1529.html Thu, 08 Mar 2012 19:23:12 +0000 Vanilla]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1529.html
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012...en-farming

To shorten up the article, it's about a proposal to establish a new type of chicken broiler farms, where you remove (or being born without) the head (or cerebral cortex?) from chickens (basically making it a living brain dead vegetable) and the feet, thus making more room. The advantage of this, is that the chickens don't actually feel the horror of being slaughtered and don't die from overgrowth (as they normally do), the disadvantage, well some people find the idea immensely unethical.

What do you think? - An ingenious idea to help overcome our global food problems, or a despicable monstrosity?

- Ethically?
- Economically (fx. increasing output 4 times)?
- Rationally?]]>
http://www.wired.co.uk/news/archive/2012...en-farming

To shorten up the article, it's about a proposal to establish a new type of chicken broiler farms, where you remove (or being born without) the head (or cerebral cortex?) from chickens (basically making it a living brain dead vegetable) and the feet, thus making more room. The advantage of this, is that the chickens don't actually feel the horror of being slaughtered and don't die from overgrowth (as they normally do), the disadvantage, well some people find the idea immensely unethical.

What do you think? - An ingenious idea to help overcome our global food problems, or a despicable monstrosity?

- Ethically?
- Economically (fx. increasing output 4 times)?
- Rationally?]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1423.html Thu, 20 Oct 2011 15:40:51 +0000 artistry]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1423.html https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1383.html Wed, 24 Aug 2011 18:44:07 +0000 teamtech]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1383.html https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1363.html Sat, 20 Aug 2011 03:11:31 +0000 Cecil15]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1363.html
The Roman Catholic religion has always voiced out their objection in a recent proposed bill that requests for the wide usage of contraceptives and that it should be available for everyone. The author of this proposed bill aims to reduce the rate of HIV infection and other STD's. It is also created to help solve the over-population at present.

So my question is, are you in favor of this? Do you agree that everyone, even the unmarried ones, can avail these contraceptives like condoms and pills as long as it is helping them?

I am personally for this proposed bill. But, I agree that this should have a limitation as well. Making these contraceptives available doesn't necessarily mean that we can abuse the use of them.]]>
The Roman Catholic religion has always voiced out their objection in a recent proposed bill that requests for the wide usage of contraceptives and that it should be available for everyone. The author of this proposed bill aims to reduce the rate of HIV infection and other STD's. It is also created to help solve the over-population at present.

So my question is, are you in favor of this? Do you agree that everyone, even the unmarried ones, can avail these contraceptives like condoms and pills as long as it is helping them?

I am personally for this proposed bill. But, I agree that this should have a limitation as well. Making these contraceptives available doesn't necessarily mean that we can abuse the use of them.]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1313.html Sun, 07 Aug 2011 20:10:23 +0000 ttpm15]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1313.html im a current ios user ( ipod touch 4th )
i think Android will become the most popular mobile os platform in the future ( all US carrier have phone that run android, but only two US carrier ( atm ) selling phone that run iOS)

IMO
android = open source, customizable, a little on a buggy side ( depend of phone ).
iOS = close source, not that customizable, running smoothly.

so give me your opinions.]]> im a current ios user ( ipod touch 4th )
i think Android will become the most popular mobile os platform in the future ( all US carrier have phone that run android, but only two US carrier ( atm ) selling phone that run iOS)

IMO
android = open source, customizable, a little on a buggy side ( depend of phone ).
iOS = close source, not that customizable, running smoothly.

so give me your opinions.]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1287.html Thu, 04 Aug 2011 22:03:03 +0000 gamingmaster42]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1287.html I think it's pretty serious. The signs are everywhere, and so will the effects if we don't do anything.]]> I think it's pretty serious. The signs are everywhere, and so will the effects if we don't do anything.]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1284.html Thu, 04 Aug 2011 04:57:54 +0000 ErrorCode]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1284.html
What do you guys think? Also, do you smoke? How do you feel about smoking/others smoking?]]>
What do you guys think? Also, do you smoke? How do you feel about smoking/others smoking?]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1266.html Wed, 03 Aug 2011 04:33:46 +0000 omgx3]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1266.html should have enough sense to use contraception most of the time. But contraceptives aren't effective all of the time. There's a small percentage, ~5% of all cases, where they fail to work properly, potentially causing an unwanted pregnancy. Abstinence would be the better option in the first place, but that's not what happens in actuality. Most likely, the woman will end up with a child she doesn't want. It's definitely not the most ideal situation for anyone, so abortion should be legalized. After all, people have the right to their own personal lives.

Any thoughts?]]> should have enough sense to use contraception most of the time. But contraceptives aren't effective all of the time. There's a small percentage, ~5% of all cases, where they fail to work properly, potentially causing an unwanted pregnancy. Abstinence would be the better option in the first place, but that's not what happens in actuality. Most likely, the woman will end up with a child she doesn't want. It's definitely not the most ideal situation for anyone, so abortion should be legalized. After all, people have the right to their own personal lives.

Any thoughts?]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1265.html Wed, 03 Aug 2011 04:01:47 +0000 omgx3]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1265.html
So are you against it? For it? Discuss.]]>
So are you against it? For it? Discuss.]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1262.html Tue, 02 Aug 2011 21:48:43 +0000 gamingmaster42]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1262.html If the government found intelligent alien life should it keep the findings a secret?

Personally, I would argue yes. I know many people would say that it is a right to be informed, but these people forget the military, political, and economic implications of such an announcement. Not to mention the mass panic that would be spread like wildfire.

What do you think?]]> If the government found intelligent alien life should it keep the findings a secret?

Personally, I would argue yes. I know many people would say that it is a right to be informed, but these people forget the military, political, and economic implications of such an announcement. Not to mention the mass panic that would be spread like wildfire.

What do you think?]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1250.html Sun, 31 Jul 2011 21:12:04 +0000 Zach]]> https://niftyhost.chary.us/support/thread-1250.html ---
I think that governments should not restrict the websites that their citizens visit. First of all, it does violate free speech. If a government shut down a bookstore for containing offensive books, the public outcry would be immense. That is basically the same thing as closing down a website for containing items which a particular group may find offensive. Also, if a website contains actual illegal content (e.g. child pornography or pirated material), the government should go after the actual people who are responsible, not after a domain name or an IP address. There is also another problem with "only" censoring illegal content: the slippery slope. Governments tend to never be satisfied with their original field of duty. What starts out as a reasonable blocking of illegal things may quickly develop into the censorship of any material the government finds unsuitable for the masses, as is the case with the Great Firewall of China.]]> ---
I think that governments should not restrict the websites that their citizens visit. First of all, it does violate free speech. If a government shut down a bookstore for containing offensive books, the public outcry would be immense. That is basically the same thing as closing down a website for containing items which a particular group may find offensive. Also, if a website contains actual illegal content (e.g. child pornography or pirated material), the government should go after the actual people who are responsible, not after a domain name or an IP address. There is also another problem with "only" censoring illegal content: the slippery slope. Governments tend to never be satisfied with their original field of duty. What starts out as a reasonable blocking of illegal things may quickly develop into the censorship of any material the government finds unsuitable for the masses, as is the case with the Great Firewall of China.]]>