There's a requisite chaos to the "hacker culture" that has been central to the rise of both Google and Facebook: cobble something together, fueled by Red Bull and pizza, until it works; keep changing it and improving it, lest a competitor jump in and create something better; and if for some reason it doesn't work, just do away with it altogether. From both the inside and the outside, it can look quite messy.
More detail on
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13577_3-200128...opStories3
Google is better. Just saying. What if they came out with a social networking site??? hahahaha
(08-10-2010, 12:37 PM)2348z Wrote: [ -> ]Google is better. Just saying. What if they came out with a social networking site??? hahahaha
No doubt Google is best but in social networking Orkut a Google product is failed. It seems something like jealousy lol;)
didnt google try to buy facebook a while back
(08-11-2010, 08:36 PM)Zack Wrote: [ -> ]didnt google try to buy facebook a while back
Yeah, they did try it, but facebook rejected or something. It was around the same period, when Microsoft tried to acquire Yahoo, if i remember correctly.
you are right
however facebook may not be successful in developing other services such as email because there are so many competitions
Google will rule the world one day! haha and they will successfully come out with a social networking site
Of course google is better then any other search engine. A facebook is just for some time to get tension free from other searching. I think facebook is only to get refresh if got hanged using other stuffs in internet.
google is better than any search engine but gmail sucks besides calling on it,but i dont really need it because a have a cell phone..lol
YAHOOMAIL is the best